Comments on: A historical perspective on TEL http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/ - On Technology Enhanced Learning Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:55:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: frepa http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-55958 frepa Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:08:43 +0000 http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/#comment-55958 Sure you can picture! There is an updated version with a CC-license at http://www.frepa.org/wp/2008/04/06/a-historical-overview-of-tel/ Sure you can picture! There is an updated version with a CC-license at http://www.frepa.org/wp/2008/04/06/a-historical-overview-of-tel/

]]> By: Jennifer http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-55948 Jennifer Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:19:03 +0000 http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/#comment-55948 This is great, I am writing a term project on e-learning and this is the best graph out there.... with your premission and credit your site, I would like to use the graphic in my report. This is great, I am writing a term project on e-learning and this is the best graph out there…. with your premission and credit your site, I would like to use the graphic in my report.

]]> By: Mikael Nilsson http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/comment-page-1/#comment-42390 Mikael Nilsson Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:59:51 +0000 http://www.frepa.org/wp/2007/10/08/a-historical-perspective-on-tel/#comment-42390 It still says "training" - what about personalization? To me, there are multiple dimensions, somewhat visible in your diagram, but that can be made more explicit. 1. Technology: from pen&paper to hypertext to ITS to WWW to Web2.0 to SemWeb etc 1.1: TEL Standards: LOM, LD, OKI, etc 2. Pedagogy: Your arrow at the top 3. Learner context: ellipses in the middle (i.e. what the learner does) 4. Social context: teacher => learner push, learner learner, asynchronous webbased L2L 5. interaction: broadcast vs. P2P with personalization 6. etc Just some ideas... It still says “training” – what about personalization?

To me, there are multiple dimensions, somewhat visible in your diagram, but that can be made more explicit.

1. Technology: from pen&paper to hypertext to ITS to WWW to Web2.0 to SemWeb etc
1.1: TEL Standards: LOM, LD, OKI, etc
2. Pedagogy: Your arrow at the top
3. Learner context: ellipses in the middle (i.e. what the learner does)
4. Social context: teacher => learner push, learner learner, asynchronous webbased L2L
5. interaction: broadcast vs. P2P with personalization
6. etc

Just some ideas…

]]>